User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EggRoll97 | 62 | 16 | 8 | 79 | Open | 15:07, 19 April 2025 | 4 days, 6 hours | no | report |
| LaundryPizza03 | 67 | 71 | 23 | 49 | Open | 03:18, 17 April 2025 | 1 day, 18 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 199.250.237.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Herzog von Teschen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism on multiple accounts, on pages including the Silesian Uprisings:, and Willy Fritsch: trying to push under the rug the Silesian name of the Uprisings, while pushing a stay from the other languages which have less importance than Silesian in the Silesian Uprisings, also on Willy Fritsch's page, ignores the ancestry and birthplace of the actor which is not only shown on the page but also on sources provided such as IMDb, ignoring further the meaning of the adjective provided for Willy being a Geographical, not only Ethnic term, seen by the American Government applying that name to immigrants from the region over 100 years ago, --TruthfulSpeech (talk) 24:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:387:15:431A:0:0:0:1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. Galaxybeing (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- XXBlackburnXx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning 47.148.253.121 (talk) 08:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- StateofPondicherry (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Puducherry (union territory), also known as Pondicherry, is a first-level administrative division of India, though not technically a state. This may be seen as an attempt to impersonate the government of Pondicherry. it's lio! | talk | work 08:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Whitesupremacist1844 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. it's lio! | talk | work 08:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: IP edit warring – WP:HEADLINE, WP:OR, and WP:POV violations. Medxvo (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent unsourced changes over the past few days, given the subject of the page passed away recently. Along with multiple conflicting reports on the individual's age. Packerfan386beer here 13:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP/new editor disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-constructive edits and vandalism from non registered IPs. Thegreatrebellion (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple users, referred to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slomzy0932 and subsequently blocked, have attempted edits to this article, particularly regarding genres. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oops, requesting this to be semi-protected, not extended confirmed protected. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP unreferenced & non-constructive edits. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Plenty of vandalism and BLP issues, especially within the past day. Entranced98 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2601:283:4600:36c0:1937:bca:aded:5635, also using other IP's in same range is persistently adding unsourced names to text, is edit warring, had not replied to Talk page warning(s) and has now started "shouting" comments to their constant reversions. Several editors have reverted these unsourced additions, which have been reverted back by IP(s). David J Johnson (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 191.99.33.138 (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article was only created two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: User request within own user space. Per BusterD's comment in Special:Diff/1285477831, it was protected because of WP:DE, but there appears to be no good reason for non-extended-confirmed users to edit my user page. That user also said I can request any administrator to change the protection level if I choose to do so. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Eight reverts of IP adding unsourced content, long plots, and vandalism in April alone. More from the previous month. CNMall41 (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruptive editing yesterday and may continue. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 06:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Dear administrators, I would like to kindly request semi-protection for the article Vachirawit Chivaaree. The page has recently been targeted by repeated unconstructive edits and minor vandalism from anonymous users. While I’ve done my best to monitor and revert the changes, the disruptions have started to affect the stability and readability of the article. Applying semi-protection would help maintain the quality of the article and reduce the need for constant cleanup. Trusted and confirmed users would still be able to contribute constructively. Warm regards, Yuzy (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for Full Protection – Caste system in Nepal
Hi, I'd like to request full protection for the article "Caste system in Nepal" due to ongoing issues with frequent disruptive edits. This page has become vulnerable to unsourced additions, biased language, and attempts to promote or uplift specific castes, which affects the neutrality and integrity of the content.
Given how sensitive caste-related topics are — especially in Nepal's context — the article is at high risk of edit wars and POV-pushing. To maintain a balanced and factual tone, I believe full protection is necessary until a stable version is agreed upon through proper discussion.
Protecting the page would:
Prevent further vandalism and bias
Encourage contributors to use the talk page for consensus
Ensure all edits are well-sourced and neutral
I deeply respect the efforts of the editing community and hope this step helps maintain Wikipedia’s standards on such an important and sensitive topic.
Thank you for your consideration. 🙏 2400:1A00:B1C0:5697:AD4B:A7C1:3FB6:6555 (talk) 08:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: I would like request the removal of page protection for Julian Bunetta. This page was salted in March 2020 following a successful AfD, and from the comments there, it seems like he failed WP:MUSICBIO at the time and that the content was lacking. While I'm sure that as true at the time, Bunetta's rise in profile, the significant increase in coverage about him, and his recent Grammy nominations made him seem a little overdue for a page, so I've been working on putting that together for the last month or so. I created a draft in my userspace that includes a plethora of sources and information about his life and career, and I think it warrants the removal of creation protection.
As an extra note, I also plan to make a discography page for him due to the volume of his work if this protection is lifted, so the existing discography section would split out to that page and expanded to include non-singles. Sock (tock talk) 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The information is outdated and due nature of protection information can be updated GlobalAirport (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- The talk page is not protected. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2008 (17 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because vandalism in this article has died down. 2600:1700:6180:6290:9166:760B:763B:2730 (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment:That's kind of what protection is for. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been protected since 2017 (8 years) as of 2025. Given that there hasn't been much vandalism, I think we could try pending changes. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Have you considered that the vandalism might have stopped because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because sockpuppet is no active anymore and not much vandalism on this page it has been protected by MelanieN on July 7, 2020 plus she no longer administrator I just checked the tool username information according to unprotection request who ever is inactive or no longer administrator it can be appeal, if who ever active then we will have to contact who protect by username administrator so I'm requesting to be unprotected. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- The last time it was unprotected (right before the aforementioned prot by MelanieN), it had to be reinstated because of sockpuppetry even after seven years. Discounting that history, this unprotection request segues into the nonsensical. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Or maybe we could try pending changes either way. 69.193.154.106 (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- PC reviewers don't check why the page is protected. They approve the changes only if they perceive them as valid. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 05:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery you didn't add the comment reason for declined why did you declined this request obviously there's no reason for declined unless you said per above like other comment from Tbhotch or Jéské Couriano tell me the reason for declined why? 2603:7000:8100:29F1:5468:438C:FBE0:8493 (talk) 06:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Reducing protection would allow for constructive contributions from more editors and help improve the article collaboratively. Wikimaster23456 (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This is an WP:ARBECR protection that cannot be reduced. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 17 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I had created around 50+ articles on the English wikipedia, I handle and edit topics mostly on colonial architectures, there are many articles needed to be created on that feild so I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account and also to help page reviewers for decreasing workload. Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ll mostly use AWB for small fixes like typos and other minor errors ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I had a trial permission to manage redirects close to a year ago, if I remember correctly. I did not have time for the back half of that trial, but have more time now. I have noticed how large the article backlog is and would try to work on lowering that, since I am finding myself with a lot more free time on here. Generally think I have a good past experience with AfD, not as much as some, but understand most guidelines well. May leave some more questionable pages up for a different reviewer, but have a good record adding categories and WikiProjects on my own article. Lots of my current pages are election pages or football pages, so might lean more into reviewing those since I am most familiar with those guidelines. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was granted temporary New page reviewer rights on 14 January 2025 ([12]) for a period of two months and again on 20 March ([13]) for an additional month. This current period is due to expire on 20 April. I would appreciate it if these rights could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 05:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active mostly at the creator side for a while and would like to help out in the filtering/supporting new editors and pages. Juxlos (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
I was granted temporary New Page Reviewer rights for one month, which expire on 20 April. During this period, I carefully completed a reasonable number of reviews (of pages of various topics), including reviewing and tagging new pages with banners, draftifying, requesting speedy deletions, and creating AfDs. While reviewing new pages, I often searched for additional reliable sources and added them to the articles I was reviewing, to ensure that they were not lacking significant coverage references. It was time-consuming, but I felt it was a good thing to do. Therefore, I kindly ask to review my NPP work and, if it's ok, consider granting me permanent NPP rights. Cinder painter (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I am requesting for the rollback rights to assist my passion in fighting against vandalism and roll off disruptive edits on Wikipedia, I actively scroll on recent changes feed and also new page feeds, I am familiar with WP:VANDALISM, I wish to use the AntiVandal tool which will help me revert more edits that goes against Wikipedia policies, I will love to help the community, Thanks to any admin willing at his or her discretion to grant me this permission. Best Regards (CP) 22:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello! Im requesting rollback rights because i am an extended confirmed user that has made hundreds of high-quality edits in mainspace. I need rollback tool to revert vandalism and other non-constructive edits more easier. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights to quickly revert clear vandalism and disruptive edits. This would help maintain article integrity and ease the workload for admins, especially during active vandalism periods. Thank you for considering my request. VeritasVanguard: "Seeking truth in every edit" 16:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 72 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 28 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 617 |
| Templates for deletion | 225 |
| Categories for deletion | 127 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 32 |
| All redirects for discussion | 462 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 30 |
| Possible copyright violations | 28 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 185 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 9 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 4 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 40 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 578 |
| Unknown copyright status | 55 |
| Unknown source | 24 |
| No non-free use rationale | 5 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 5 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,280 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 452 |
| Protected against vandalism | 5 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,334 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,200 | 0.49 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,268 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,349 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,930 | 0.59 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,509 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 544,434 | 7.8 |
| All articles lacking sources | 64,877 | 0.93 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 26 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 482,513 | 6.91 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,669 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 106,134 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 286,894 | 4.11 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 129 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 17 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,211 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 807 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,775 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 400 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,307 | 0.78 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,253 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,371 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,771 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,581 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 1,130 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 5,121 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,839 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,558 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||